Capt Pankaj Pahil
www.ghostaviator.com
Capt Pankaj Pahil
www.ghostaviator.com
Capt Pankaj Pahil
DGCA CPL / ATPL Study Notes • Radio Navigation • Ch 10

✈ Chapter 10: MLS
Microwave Landing System

📋 Contents

1. Introduction & ILS Disadvantages 2. The MLS System 3. Principle of Operation (TRSB) 4. Airborne Equipment 5. MLS Summary 6. Practice Question
© Capt Pankaj Pahil | www.ghostaviator.com

1. Introduction & ILS Disadvantages

The Microwave Landing System (MLS) was designed to replace ILS as the ICAO standard precision approach system, overcoming ILS limitations while providing greater flexibility. However, few MLS installations exist and they co-exist with ILS.

⚠ Why ILS Needed Replacing — ILS Disadvantages

2. The MLS System

Fig 10.1: MLS coverage — ±40° azimuth, 20–30 NM range, up to 20,000 ft
Fig 10.1: MLS coverage — ±40° azimuth, 20–30 NM range, up to 20,000 ft
📡 MLS Key Features
ParameterMLS Valuevs ILS
Channels200ILS: 40
Frequency bandSHF: 5031–5090.7 MHzILS: VHF/UHF
Azimuth coverage±40°ILS: ±35° (limited)
Glide slope range0.9° to 20° selectableILS: fixed ~3°
Usable range (UK)20 NM (up to 30 NM)ILS: 25 NM/±10°
Max coverage height20,000 ftILS: variable
Back courseSecondary system ±20°, 15° elevation, 10 NM, 10,000 ftILS: problematic
DMEBuilt-in DMEILS: optional
Ident prefixM + two lettersILS: I + letters
AimCAT III operationsILS: CAT I/II/III
✓ MLS Advantages Over ILS
Fig 10.2: MLS approach coverage volume and Fig 10.3: Flight deck control panel
Fig 10.2: MLS approach coverage volume and Fig 10.3: Flight deck control panel

3. Principle of Operation

MLS uses Time Division Multiplexing (TDM) — only one frequency per channel; all ground equipment transmissions are synchronized to avoid interference.

Fig 10.4: TO and FRO scanning beam — time difference proportional to aircraft angular position
Fig 10.4: TO and FRO scanning beam — time difference proportional to aircraft angular position
📡 Time Referenced Scanning Beam (TRSB)
MeasurementHow It Works
AzimuthBeam sweeps “TO” then “FRO” across the scan sector. Aircraft measures the time interval between the two receptions. Time interval = angular position relative to runway centreline (QDM).
ElevationSecond beam sweeps up then down. Aircraft measures time difference between up/down pulses = angular position above horizontal = selected glide slope.
RangeBuilt-in DME (DME/P for Cat II/III — accurate to within 100 ft).
📡 Other MLS Components
Fig 10.5: MLS component site layout
Fig 10.5: MLS component site layout

4. Airborne Equipment

Fig 10.6: MLS control panel — mode selector, display select, angle/channel selector
Fig 10.6: MLS control panel — mode selector, display select, angle/channel selector
📡 MLS Airborne Equipment Features

5. MLS Summary

ParameterDetails
PurposePrecision approach system; designed to replace ILS
Frequency bandSHF: 5031–5090.7 MHz
Channels200
PrincipleTRSB (Time Referenced Scanning Beam) — time between TO/FRO sweeps
Azimuth coverage±40° of runway QDM
Glide slope0.9° to 20° selectable
Range (UK)20 NM; up to 30 NM
Range measurementBuilt-in DME (DME/P for Cat II/III: ±100 ft)
IdentM + 2 letters
DisplayCross-bars (same as ILS CDI); relative to selected course
Target categoryCAT III

6. Practice Question

Q1. The coverage of the Microwave Landing System in the UK extends to ___ up to a height of ___ and ___ either side of the on-course line.
(a) 20 NM, 20,000 ft, 40 degrees
(b) 35 NM, 5,000 ft, 40 degrees
(c) 35 NM, 5,000 ft, 20 degrees
(d) 17 NM, 2,000 ft, 35 degrees
Answer: (a)
MLS in the UK: range 20 NM, height 20,000 ft, azimuth ±40° of runway centreline.
© Capt Pankaj Pahil | www.ghostaviator.com
DGCA CPL/ATPL Radio Navigation Study Notes
Chapter 10 — MLS (Microwave Landing System)
Capt Pankaj Pahil | www.ghostaviator.com
For personal study use only.